Huh?Seija...you really...No! Hey! Y-You're wro-...I mean, erm...!Thank you, Seija! I love you too!Yup!....gh! Sh-sh-shut up, you stupid moron! Stuuuupiiiid!!!Todaaay is the ohhh-so- funnn Valentine's Day! The day you give chocolate to the one you like!But I'm an amanojaku! I turn it around in reverse! That's why I gave my chocolates to the one I hate. Ha ha ha, and you accepted it, Shinmyoumaru— stuuupid, stuuupid!ShoooockIsn't that a bit weird?Look, first of all, you said the reverse of "give chocolate to the one you like" is "give chocolate to the one you hate." However, to begin with, that "give chocolate to the one you like" phrase has two points that can be turned around: "like" and "give". When you reverse both of them, you get "Don't give the chocolate to the one you hate." Follow me so far? But you gave the chocolate. If so, then semantically, it gets weird if the pre-reversal line isn't "Don't give the chocolate to the one you like." In other words, you only reversed the part about the feelings. In main, you said "reverse", but "reverse" can make "If you like someone, then give them chocolate" into "If you give someone chocolate, then you like them." This is what's called a mathematical or logical reversal. Are you all right? Still with me?Heck, from the beginning, you defined the meaning of Valentine's Day as "if like, then give". If we use this as the proposition, then your "reverse" will give us "if give, then like", understand? Next, you actually did give it to her, yet you said "hate". Now, we presume that your actual behavior is right, or "true", so in other words, it becomes a matter of which is wrong: the proposition that becomes our premise, or your "reversal" of it. To be sure, the general rule is "A reversal will always be not true." In fact, there is a "reversed is not necessarily true" rule, so we'll establish which is correct and which is wrong. Well then, which one is wrong? Your "give to the one you like" proposition is, in principle, true. In other words, the "reverse" of that, "if give, then like", is false. Therefore, we conclude that "if 'like' then 'give'; however, if 'give' then not necessarily 'like', it can also be 'hate'. Also, if not 'give', then 'hate'".
So, since you gave, what is your true motive? If your behavior, as said before, is the reverse of your real motive only, then your true feelings will be "like". Understand? In other words, you like Shinmyoumaru (essential)..... Eh!? No, just a...wait! Something's a bit off! There's probably flaws all over that...!You followed all that...!?Aand happily ever after.
....gh! Sh-sh-shut up, you stupid moron! Stuuuupiiiid!!!
Todaaay is the ohhh-so- funnn Valentine's Day! The day you give chocolate to the one you like!
But I'm an amanojaku! I turn it around in reverse! That's why I gave my chocolates to the one I hate. Ha ha ha, and you accepted it, Shinmyoumaru— stuuupid, stuuupid!
Shoooock
Isn't that a bit weird?
Look, first of all, you said the reverse of "give chocolate to the one you like" is "give chocolate to the one you hate." However, to begin with, that "give chocolate to the one you like" phrase has two points that can be turned around: "like" and "give". When you reverse both of them, you get "Don't give the chocolate to the one you hate." Follow me so far? But you gave the chocolate. If so, then semantically, it gets weird if the pre-reversal line isn't "Don't give the chocolate to the one you like." In other words, you only reversed the part about the feelings. In main, you said "reverse", but "reverse" can make "If you like someone, then give them chocolate" into "If you give someone chocolate, then you like them." This is what's called a mathematical or logical reversal. Are you all right? Still with me?
Heck, from the beginning, you defined the meaning of Valentine's Day as "if like, then give". If we use this as the proposition, then your "reverse" will give us "if give, then like", understand? Next, you actually did give it to her, yet you said "hate". Now, we presume that your actual behavior is right, or "true", so in other words, it becomes a matter of which is wrong: the proposition that becomes our premise, or your "reversal" of it. To be sure, the general rule is "A reversal will always be not true." In fact, there is a "reversed is not necessarily true" rule, so we'll establish which is correct and which is wrong. Well then, which one is wrong? Your "give to the one you like" proposition is, in principle, true. In other words, the "reverse" of that, "if give, then like", is false. Therefore, we conclude that "if 'like' then 'give'; however, if 'give' then not necessarily 'like', it can also be 'hate'. Also, if not 'give', then 'hate'".
So, since you gave, what is your true motive? If your behavior, as said before, is the reverse of your real motive only, then your true feelings will be "like". Understand? In other words, you like Shinmyoumaru (essential).
.... Eh!? No, just a...wait! Something's a bit off! There's probably flaws all over that...!
Comments
Leave a comment